[MCN] Saving streams and rivers for fish: How much shade needed?
lance at wildrockies.org
Sat Sep 5 11:03:25 EDT 2015
Water Resources Research 27 May 2015
Seeing the landscape for the trees: Metrics to guide riparian
shade management in river catchments
Matthew F. Johnson and Robert L. Wilby
-Temperature over long stretches of river will not be affected by
-Midreaches of headwater streams are most responsive to riparian shade
-To offset a 1C temperature rise, 1 km of trees is necessary in UK
Rising water temperature (Tw) due to anthropogenic climate change may
have serious conse- quences for river ecosystems. Conservation and/or
expansion of riparian shade could counter warming and buy time for
ecosystems to adapt. However, sensitivity of river reaches to direct
solar radiation is highly heterogeneous in space and time, so
benefits of shading are also expected to be site specific. We use a
network of high-resolution temperature measurements from two upland
rivers in the UK, in conjunction with topographic shade modeling, to
assess the relative significance of landscape and riparian shade to
the thermal behavior of river reaches. Trees occupy 7% of the study
catchments (comparable with the UK national aver- age) yet shade
covers 52% of the area and is concentrated along river corridors.
Riparian shade is most ben- eficial for managing Tw at distances 5-20
km downstream from the source of the rivers where discharge is
modest, flow is dominated by near-surface hydrological pathways,
there is a wide floodplain with little land- scape shade, and where
cumulative solar exposure times are sufficient to affect Tw. For the
rivers studied, we find that approximately 0.5 km of complete shade
is necessary to off-set Tw by 1C during July (the month with peak Tw)
at a headwater site; whereas 1.1 km of shade is required 25 km
downstream. Further research is needed to assess the integrated
effect of future changes in air temperature, sunshine duration,
direct solar radiation, and downward diffuse radiation on Tw to help
tree planting schemes achieve intended outcomes.
"Nothing an institution can do will prevent misconduct altogether.
This is not the goal. Rather, it is to support the work of
well-meaning scientists, to reduce the waste from biased results, and
to relieve some of the pressures that encourage sloppy science."
Nature 525, 25-27 (03 September 2015) doi:10.1038/525025a
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Missoula-Community-News