<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Forbes: Only One Loser In Obama's Clean
Power Plan</title></head><body>
<div><font face="Geneva"><i>Forbes</i> 8/04/2015</font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva"><br></font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva"><b>Only One Loser In Obama's Clean
Power Plan</b></font><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Geneva">1st 2 paragraphs</font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva"><br>
President Obama announced EPA's new Clean Power Plan at the White
House yesterday, citing the need to reduce carbon pollution from power
plants as an historic step in taking real action on climate
change.</font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva"><br>
Natural gas, renewables, nuclear and efficiency are the winners. Coal
is the loser.</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div
>http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2015/08/04/only-one-loser-in-<span
></span>obamas-clean-power-plan/</div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><font size="-1"
color="#000000"
>====================================================================<span
></span>================<br>
<font face="Verdana">"Climate change is not a new topic in biology
Observations of range shifts in parallel with climate change date
back to the mid-1700s."<br>
<br>
"A surprising result is the high proportion of species responding to
recent, relatively mild climate change (global average warming of
0.6C). The proportion of wild species impacted by climate change was
estimated at 41% of all species (655 of 1598)."<br>
<br>
Parmesan, Camille. Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent
Climate Change.<i> The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and
Systematics</i> 2006. 37:637-69. First published online as a
Review in Advance on August 24, 2006</font></font></div>
<div><font face="Bookman Old Style" size="-1" color="#000000"><br>
<br>
</font></div>
</body>
</html>