<div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">For Immediate Release, January 5, 2016</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Contacts:</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Andrea Santarsiere, Center for Biological Diversity, (303) 854-7748</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Ken Cole, Western Watersheds Project, (208) 429-1679<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span></span></font><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial">Gary Macfarlane, Friends of the Clearwater, (208) 882-9755</span></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Nick Cady, Cascadia Wildlands, (314) 482-3746</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Matthew Koehler, WildWest Institute, (406) 396-0321<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div style="text-align:center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><b>Legal Petition Seeks Extension of Federal Monitoring for Northern Rockies Wolves</b></span></font></div><div style="text-align:center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><b><br></b></span></font></div><div style="text-align:center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><b>New Study: Hunting Likely Spurring Harmful Declines in Northern Rocky Wolves</b></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">VICTOR, Idaho — Five conservation groups filed a petition (<b><a href="http://bit.ly/1ZMpoHi">http://bit.ly/1ZMpoHi</a></b>) </span></font><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial">today requesting that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service continue monitoring northern Rocky Mountain gray wolves for another five years. The existing monitoring program, which is required by the Endangered Species Act after protections are removed for a species, is set to expire in May. The monitoring is crucial to ensure that the wolf population doesn’t slip to levels at which Endangered Species Act protections are again needed.</span></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">The groups based today’s request in part on a new study in the journal Science that found the Fish and Wildlife Service and states of Montana and Idaho have underestimated the impacts and risks of aggressive hunting policies for gray wolves instituted since protections were lifted. Since federal safeguards were first stripped in 2009, more than 2,300 wolves have been killed by hunters or trappers in the two states.</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“This research confirms what many scientists have been saying all along,” said Andrea Santarsiere, staff attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Aggressive hunting of wolves is harming the gray wolf population in the northern Rockies. Left unchecked, the numbers will continue to decline — a sad fact for an animal that we fought so hard to bring back from the brink of extinction. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service clearly needs to continue to keep an eye on this situation.” </span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">In first removing Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in 2009, the Fish and Wildlife Service said that the required post-delisting monitoring period would be extended for an additional five years if any one of three criteria are met. One criterion requires an extension if a significant change in state law or management would significantly increase threats to the wolf population. Both Idaho and Montana have repeatedly increased hunting and trapping quotas in an effort to substantially reduce wolf populations, which according to the new study are almost certainly resulting in population declines. </span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“Antagonism towards wolves is one of the main threats that put them on the endangered species list in the first place. This has hardly changed, and the states have further demonstrated their continued aggression towards wolves by increasing killing efforts and liberalizing hunting and trapping of wolves” said Ken Cole, Idaho director for Western Watersheds Project. “The Fish and Wildlife Service should extend their oversight of wolf management by the states to ensure stable and viable wolf populations”</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“As a backcountry elk and deer hunter myself, I find it appalling that in Montana hunters and trappers can legally kill up to five wolves annually, including deep within our Wilderness areas,” said Matthew Koehler, director of the Montana-based WildWest Institute. “Essentially this allows hunters or trappers to legally wipe out an entire wolf pack.”</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“Furthermore, since politicians – including Montana Senator Jon Tester – removed ESA protections for gray wolves in Montana and Idaho via a rider attached to an unrelated spending bill, we’re seen an increase in unethical and disgusting wolf-killing contests in the region,” said Koehler. </span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“Given these circumstances, requiring the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to continue monitoring northern Rocky Mountain gray wolves for another five years is the right thing to do scientifically, as well as ethically, to ensure that wolves are not once again hunted and trapped to the brink of extinction,” explained Koehler. “I call on all my fellow hunters who claim to support the ‘North American Wildlife Conservation Model’ to support more this legal petition.”</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">Idaho has been especially aggressive in trying to reduce the wolf population. In 2014 the Idaho Legislature created the Idaho Wolf Control Board, allocating hundreds of thousands of dollars to killing wolves. Idaho has also contracted with the federal Wildlife Services to hunt, trap and aerially gun down wolves in the Lolo Zone and hired a professional trapper to eliminate two wolf packs in the Frank-Church-River-of-No Return Wilderness last winter. The agency has also turned a blind eye to an annual predator derby contest, in which participants win cash and prizes for killing wolves and coyotes, despite an agency policy condemning predator hunting contests as unethical.</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“Idaho has been waging a war against wolves in the Lochsa and North Fork Clearwater basins, one of the wildest areas in the lower 48 states,” said Gary MacFarlane, ecosystem defense director of Friends of the Clearwater. “Further monitoring of this ill-advised program is needed.”</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“The primary threat to wolves is active eradication efforts occurring throughout the Rocky Mountain distinct population segment,” said Nick Cady, legal director of Cascadia Wildlands. “Continued monitoring of this still-fragile population is without question necessary and critical to the wolf’s recovery in the United States.” </span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">The Fish and Wildlife Service has argued that the wolf population has stayed relatively constant despite hunting, but according to the new study this conclusion is questionable. Among other problems, Montana has changed its counting methodology after delisting, and Idaho continues to rely on a convoluted mathematical equation that is likely to overestimate the wolf population, making it difficult to accurately determine population trends. </span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">“Idaho and Montana aren’t safe places for wolves right now,” Santarsiere said. “This is no time for the Fish and Wildlife Service to walk away from its duty to ensure this population survives and thrives. We know these wolves have been hammered by hunting and aggressive state policies and still need help.”</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:16px;line-height:17.4545px;white-space:pre-wrap">COPY of the LEGAL PETITION: <a href="http://bit.ly/1ZMpoHi">http://bit.ly/1ZMpoHi</a>
# # #</span></font></div><div><br></div></div>