<div dir="ltr"><div><h1 class="gmail-l-article__hed" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px 0px 8px;line-height:1;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<p class="gmail-p1">
</p><p class="gmail-p1"><span style="font-weight:normal"><font face="verdana, sans-serif" size="2">This interview with Philip Higuera, a professor of fire ecology at the University of Montana, is excellent. It was conducted by Joe Eaton, who teaches at the University of Montana School of Journalism. Unfortunately, this piece didn’t appear in any Montana media outlets, but rather was printed in CityLab, which is run by The Atlantic.<span class="gmail-Apple-converted-space"> <br><br></span></font></span><span style="color:rgb(43,43,43);font-family:"Open Sans";font-size:17px;font-weight:normal">Imagine how different the discussion and debate about wildfires, public lands management and logging would be if experts and facts like this were part of the discussion. Well, in defense of the environmental movement, we’ve been bringing up the same facts both this year, and in many wildfire seasons over the past few decades.<br></span><span style="font-weight:normal"><font face="verdana, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="gmail-Apple-converted-space"><br></span></font></span></p><p class="gmail-p1"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">The West Is on Fire. Get Used to It.</span><br></p></h1></div><div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-1" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><i>A fire ecologist explains why this summer’s wildfires are so dramatic, and why the West will have to learn to live with a more severe burning season.</i><br><br>By </font><a class="gmail-c-byline__link gmail-c-byline__link--article__hed" href="https://www.citylab.com/authors/joe-eaton/" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;letter-spacing:1px;text-transform:uppercase;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0);box-sizing:inherit">JOE EATON</a> <span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;letter-spacing:1px;text-transform:uppercase">SEP 11, 2017</span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">SOURCE: </font><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><a href="https://www.citylab.com/environment/2017/09/the-west-is-on-fire-get-used-to-it/539352/">https://www.citylab.com/environment/2017/09/the-west-is-on-fire-get-used-to-it/539352/</a><br></span><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><br>The West is burning, and there’s no relief in sight. More than 80 large wildfires are raging in an area covering more than 1.4 million acres, primarily in California, Montana, and Oregon, <a href="https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/nfn.htm" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">according to the National Interagency Fire Center</a>. Taken together, that’s a wildfire <a href="http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/state-area.html" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">larger than the state of </a><a style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;text-decoration-line:underline">Delaware.</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">California has declared a state of emergency as wildfires burn outside Los Angeles and <a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-railroad-fire-update-20170906-story.html" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">threaten giant sequoias</a> in Yosemite National Park. In Oregon, the Eagle Creek fire is <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/photo-of-the-week-a-hellish-vision-of-portland-oregons-famous-gorge-in-flames/" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">tearing through</a> the scenic Columbia River Gorge. Seattle, Boise, and Denver are socked in under a haze of smoky air and ash that experts predict could linger until the first snowfall in the mountains.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">But nowhere are the fires more devastating than in Montana, where more than <a href="http://helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/more-than-million-acres-have-burned-this-summer-state-fire/article_17e6c8ce-93e3-11e7-9fec-eb8fa6dd55c1.html" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">1 million acres of forest burned</a> this summer, and <a href="https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/nfn.htm" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">more than 467,000 acres are currently burning</a> in 26 large fires that line the mountainous western side of the state.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.cfc.umt.edu/personnel/details.php?ID=4147" style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Philip Higuera</a>, a professor of fire ecology at the University of Montana, is used to seeing smoky air from his office window in September, but nothing like the thick smoke filling Missoula Valley right now. He recently spoke to CityLab about the fires raging across the West, what we can do about them, and why this year’s big burn might be the new normal.</font></p></section><div class="gmail-ad-box-wrapper" style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"></div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-2" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">Breathing the air in Missoula today feels like chain-smoking Chesterfields. Schools aren’t letting the kids out at recess, and p</span><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">ublic health authorities are saying active adults and children should avoid outdoor exertion. </span><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">It’s easy to get the impression that this is an extraordinary and unprecedented fire season.</span><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"> But you study forest fires over a timespan of thousands of years. How unusual or unique is this fire season?</span></font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">It’s not—even in the context of the 21st century. In the Northern Rockies, we had a very large fire year in 2012, in 2007, in 2000, and to an extent in 2003. In this region, 1910 remains the record-setting fire season. If we surpass that, I would be surprised. Events like these are not common on a year-to-year scale. On the other hand, when you look at the role fire plays in ecosystems, you have to look at a longer timescale, and these rare events are what’s expected every once in a while.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Why is this fire season so dramatic?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">The main reason there is so much burning right now is the strong seasonal drought across the region. The term we use is that these fires are “climate enabled.” The drought makes most of the vegetation, live or dead, receptive to burning. In Missoula, we had the driest July and August on record and the third-warmest July and August. With those types of conditions, we expect widespread burning. But people underestimate the role that seasonal climate plays in these events, and we start to grasp at lots of other things to explain it.</font></p></section><div class="gmail-ad-box-wrapper" style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"></div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-3" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Aside from the bad air, are most urban residents in fire-affected parts of the West safe?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Aside from that really important impact, I give a cautious yes. There is a risk. And that risk is highest in the wildland-urban interface. If you are living there, you should know that you are living with a much higher risk for exposure to wildfire. And part of the job of educators and U.S. Forest Service outreach is to make that risk known. Eventually insurance companies will also get on board. Floods are obviously on insurance companies’ radar front and center. Wildfire is still not frequent enough that they design programs around it.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Should people in the fire-prone West be living in places like that—in the suburbs and exurbs out in the forested edges of urban areas?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Every place on our planet has some natural phenomenon that is not friendly to humans. If you live on the East Coast, you are going to experience hurricanes. If you live in the Midwest, you are going to experience tornadoes. If you live across forested regions in the West, you are going to experience wildfires. We need to develop in a way that is cognizant of these processes—that is not ignorant of the way the planet, and the environment you live in, works.</font></p></section></div><div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-3" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Why are these fires so hard to put out?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">This goes back to why the fires are happening. The fuels are extremely dry. And most areas burn during extreme weather conditions—the days when it’s hot, humidity is low and there are high winds. These are the conditions in which fires quickly double in size. They are also the conditions where it’s most dangerous to put people in front of the fire. Also, a lot of these fires start in very remote areas with rugged terrain, and just putting people on the ground comes with some risk.</font></p></section><div class="gmail-ad-box-wrapper" style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"></div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-4" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">Montana alone has already spent tens of millions of dollars trying to suppress wildfires this summer, and two firefighters have been killed. Is that having any impact, o</span><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">r is it like driving down the expressway throwing bags of money out the window?</span></font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">When you say it’s not working, the key question is, What’s the goal? “It’s not working” assumes the goal is to have no fires. We will fail if that is the goal. Most of these ecosystems that are burning have evolved with fire. We expect them to burn. We need them to burn if we want them to continue to exist.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">So it’s like trying to stop rain?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">It’s like trying to stop an earthquake. Trying to stop a volcano. To me, the goal can’t be to have no fire. That’s gotten us into trouble when we pursued that goal. I think the metric should be how much area has burned that we wanted to burn compared to how much burned that we didn’t want to burn. Or closer to the nugget, how many resources were harmed—how many houses were lost, how many people were either directly or indirectly killed?</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">You don’t see raging forest fires as a failure of suppression efforts?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">No. Knowing how climate enables and drives these large fires, I think that it would be impossible to put these fires out.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">There is a school of thought that says we should not suppress wildfire because it allows smaller trees and underbrush to accumulate, which leads to larger, hotter fires later. So why not just let it burn?</font></span></p></section><div class="gmail-ad-native-wrapper" style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"></div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-5" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">I think as soon as you live in these environments you will quickly abandon that too-simplistic view. Maybe when I was a graduate student living in Seattle that seemed more like a possibility, but you can’t just let it burn. That would not be wise. It really comes down to what you can afford to burn and what do you want to protect. If the fire is in the wilderness, that’s great. If it’s burning toward a community, that’s not so good.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">There’s good fire and bad fire?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">There is a spectrum. On one end of the spectrum would be the wilderness fire that is not going to impact anyone—good fire. The fire that burns down your house or kills people—bad fire.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">Another <a style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;text-decoration-line:underline">school of thought says </a></span><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder">we should allow more logging to clear trees and help prevent wildfires. Does that hold water?</span></font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">I don’t think that holds water. That is based on the assumption that fires are occurring because there is more fuel available to burn than in the past. That’s generally not what’s driving this. It’s the drought. It’s true that if cut, there is less fuel in the forests. But in a lot of cases, there is what’s called slash—woody debris—left on the ground that will carry fire across the forest floor, which is what you need for it to spread.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">The simple answer—if you want to eliminate fire, then pave it. There will be no fire.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Is climate change partly to blame for this year’s fires? Are wildfires in the West set to get worse because of it?</font></span></p></section><div class="gmail-ad-box-wrapper" style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"></div><section class="gmail-s-article__section gmail-o-small-container" id="gmail-article-section-6" style="box-sizing:inherit;margin:0px auto;max-width:620px;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><p style="box-sizing:inherit"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">That’s what future climate models project. We can’t say this individual fire was because of climate change. We can’t say this year was because of climate change. But these types of years are what we expect to see more frequently. I heard an analogy that I think is useful. If a baseball player is using steroids and hits a home run, can you attribute that home run to steroids? You can’t—but you know that at some point some component of that was brought to you by this artificial input to the system.</font></p></section><p style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">There <a style="box-sizing:inherit;background-color:transparent;text-decoration-line:underline">was a study</a> that came out last year, which looked at fire occurrence in the Western United States over the last 40 years using climate modeling. The conclusion was almost half of burning we have seen over the past several decades can be attributed to climate change due to anthropogenic sources. The fire season has gotten significantly longer across the West, on order of 30 days or more during the past few decades.</font></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="box-sizing:inherit;font-weight:bolder"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">What are you and your family doing to live through the fire season?</font></span></p><p style="box-sizing:inherit;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Personally, I made the decision to not live in the wildland-urban interface. I live in the urban part of Missoula. We had one HEPA air filter. Last week we ordered two more. That’s our adaptation.</font></p></div></div>