<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><div style="margin: 0px; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 17.5px; line-height: normal; font-family: "Helvetica Neue"; color: rgb(14, 58, 104);" class=""><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;" class=""><a href="https://il9gskebb.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001wVyu4jOKRIxyHLbxQISM1rWZJDi2R4tW-XmQTDMrwQzFCn0_7-vG0jWhRABdlo_C-zdyhoR2rONeqvTrp4zvq8yh3piCuCPa3ilQp1NUWWYM0hmjWuoaFv4X8NOOR_m34ZscVgY95F0Qga5ZzUh4gx0qhzCfF1svRQHE7fGS8ad5UahQWozgMjI4oiI-IMEuvQZL-TqFpWxkLb1vtThp2Q==&c=UDsu6zFy5xqS9Rfcuqcxh71UhF1FxZC9yaLEYkk8omTIB0afb20R6w==&ch=y4MjP0NCisPq2IfGG3R2XrUpkHNUBA0lFY4Oco4khoiD1ieeEKcuRw==" class="">The Fast Fire Threat</a></span></div><div style="margin: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: "Helvetica Neue"; color: rgb(38, 38, 38);" class=""><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;" class="">Two decades of satellite data show that the most destructive U.S. fires burn in grasslands and shrublands fanned by strong winds.</span></div><div class=""></div><div class=""></div><br class=""></div><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">2007<br class=""><br class="">************<br class=""><br class="">“…. Even when emissions are stabilized at 90% below present levels at 2050, this 2.0C threshold is eventually broken.”<br class=""><br class="">Andrew J. Weaver et al. Long term climate implications of 2050 emission reduction targets. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007<br class=""><br class=""> <br class="">2008<br class=""><br class="">************<br class=""><br class="">“…. even the most aggressive CO2 mitigation steps as envisioned now can only limit further additions to the committed warming, but not reduce the already committed GHGs warming of 2.4°C.”<br class=""><br class="">On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead<br class=""><br class="">V. Ramanathan* and Y. Feng. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences September 23, 2008<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">2008<br class=""><br class="">**********<br class=""><br class="">“In their excellent Perspectives article in this issue, Ramanathan and Feng (R&F) sound a harsh wake-up call for those concerned about anthropogenic climate change: the authors maintain that the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the past have already loaded the Earth System sufficiently to bring about disastrous global warming. In other words, the ultimate goal of climate protection policy, as stipulated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), appears to be a delusion.<br class=""><br class="">“Venturing into the 2 realm is risky, … because large-scale nonlinear responses of the planetary machinery are likely to be triggered then. These effects might even conspire to bring about — in the worst of all possible climate change science fictions —something like a runaway greenhouse effect.”<br class=""><br class="">“… the race between climate dynamics and climate policy will be a close one …. requires an industrial revolution for sustainability starting now.”<br class=""><br class="">Global warming: Stop worrying, start panicking?<br class=""><br class="">Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences September 23, 2008<br class=""><br class="">2011<br class=""><br class="">*********<br class=""><br class="">“The 2007 Bali conference heard repeated calls for reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions of 50 per cent by 2050 to avoid exceeding the 2C threshold. …. it is increasingly unlikely any global agreement will deliver the radical reversal in emission trends required for stabilization at 450 ppmv carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Similarly, the current framing of climate change cannot be reconciled with the rates of mitigation necessary to stabilize at 550 ppmv CO2e and even an optimistic interpretation suggests stabilization much below 650 ppmv CO2e is improbable.”<br class=""><br class="">Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends<br class=""><br class="">Kevin Anderson and Alice Bows. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (2011)<br class=""><br class=""> </div>
</div>
<br class=""></body></html>