[MCN] Rural-Urban Divide, worldwide?

Lance Olsen lance at wildrockies.org
Mon Mar 7 11:05:22 EST 2016


Urban Climate >journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/uclim

From global 'North-South' to local 'Urban-Rural': 
A shifting paradigm in climate governance?
Mahendra Sethi, Jose Puppim de Oliveira

Keywords:
Climate governance - Carbon access and allocation 
- Ethics and equity - North South -Spatial - 
Urban-rural

Abstract (Open access)
http://i.unu.edu/media/iigh.unu.edu/news/3958/Urban-Climate_Oliveira-Sethi.pdf?utm_source=home&utm_medium=text&utm_term=article&utm_content=shifting-climate-governance-paradigm&utm_campaign=unu-iigh

As the world takes an unprecedented rural-urban 
population tilt, the 21st century poses a 
challenge in further tinkering the 
internationally evident disparities in access and 
allocation of carbon. Traditionally, inequalities 
have been negotiated from economic or 'state of 
development' perspective. This research, to our 
knowledge is the first of its kind that plots 
carbon emission of over 200 nations/territories 
against a spatial framework. The study argues 
that existing dualities in the international 
climate change governance, evident in the so 
called global 'North-South' economic divide, has 
a stronger component of 'Urban-Rural' spatial 
disparity in the making, which is likely to 
further precipitate into a much local but complex 
dynamic, particularly relevant to the developing 
world, that face the double challenge of rapid 
urbanization and environmental sustainability. 
The paper discusses the ethical, empirical and 
governance gaps in climate governance related to 
the urban-rural carbon dynamics and conclude with 
a future pathway, committed to pro- cedural 
justice and sub-nationalization of carbon 
governance, fairly acknowledging carbon flows at 
the local level through standard inventories 
based on consumption criteria. The research 
offers a shifting paradigm in global climate 
governance, in view of the inclusion of cities as 
Goal 11 within the upcoming sustainable 
development goals and the UNFCCC COP21 to be held 
in Paris in 2015 and beyond.
! 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  (Open access)
http://i.unu.edu/media/iigh.unu.edu/news/3958/Urban-Climate_Oliveira-Sethi.pdf?utm_source=home&utm_medium=text&utm_term=article&utm_content=shifting-climate-governance-paradigm&utm_campaign=unu-iigh

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Šthe proportion of the land surface in extreme 
drought is predicted to increase from 1% for the 
present day to 30% by the end of the twenty-first 
century." 

Eleanor J. Burke et al. Modeling the Recent 
Evolution of Global Drought and Projections for 
the Twenty-First Century with the Hadley Centre 
Climate Model. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY 
OCTOBER 2006
--------------------------------------------------

"Under RCP8.5, droughts exceeding 40% of analyzed 
land area are projected by nearly half of the 
simulations."

Christel Prudhomme et al. Hydrological droughts 
in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties 
from a global multimodel ensemble experiment.
PNAS vol. 111 no. 9 March 11, 2014
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222473110
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/9/3262.abstract

-------------------------------------------------- 
1.5C 
--------------------------------------------------
"While it is quite legitimate for the UNFCCC to 
ask the IPCC to evaluate the implications of a 
1.5 °C warming target, climate researchers and 
the IPCC need to understand the political reasons 
for such a request. They should be cautious and 
not naively be drawn into undertaking new cycles 
of studies in the expectation that they will make 
a difference to the world of politics (12-14).

Nature Climate Change VOL 6 | MARCH 2016
COMMENTARY:
1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement
Mike Hulme, Department of Geography, Faculty of 
Social Science and Public Policy, King's College 
London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

References
1.Climate Action Tracker (accessed January 2016);
http://climateactiontracker.org
2.Edenhofer, E. & Kowarsch, M. Environ. Sci. Pol. 51, 56-64 (2015).
3.Carraro, C. et al. Science 350, 34-35 (2015).
4.Hulme, M. & Mahony, M. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 34, 705-718 (2010).
5.Smith, P. et al. Nature Clim. Change 6, 42-50 (2016).
6.Lee, H. Science 350, 1007 (2015).
7.Future Earth (2016); http://www.futureearth.org/projects
8.Beck, S. et al. GAiA 23/2, 80-87 (2014).
9.Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Science 345, 37-38 (2014).
10. Hulme, M. Nature 463, 730-731 (2010).
11. Geden, O. Paris climate deal: the trouble with targetism.
The Guardian (14 December 2015); http://go.nature.com/q9TRFV
12. Geden, O. Nature 521, 27-28 (2015).
13. Geden, O. & Beck, S. Nature Clim. Change 4, 747-748 (2014).
14. Anderson, K. Nature 528, 437 (2015).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bigskynet.org/pipermail/missoula-community-news_bigskynet.org/attachments/20160307/a038d729/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Missoula-Community-News mailing list